|
Wednesday, September 6: Introductory Remarks. No reading. Monday, September 11: Distinguishing between Formalist, Behavioral, and Strategic Approaches. 1. Deciding to Decide: Chapters 1 and 2. 2. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model: Chapters 1-3. 3. The Choices Justices Make: Chapters 1 and 2. Wednesday, September 13: How could we tell who's right? 1. "Symposium: The State of the Field, 1996," (various authors) from the Law and Courts Section Newsletter (Spring 1996). Monday, September 18: Granting Certiorari: The Legal Process Model. 1. Deciding to Decide: pp. 41-112; 216-292. Wednesday, September 20: Is the Cert vote really a vote on the merits? 1. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model: Chapter 5. 2. Songer, Donald. 1979. "Concern for Policy Outputs As a Cue for Supreme Court Decisions on Certiorari.' (41JOP 1185-94). TopMonday, September 25: Strategic Voting on Certiorari. 1. Deciding to Decide: pp. 113-215. 2. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 56-65, 79-88, 118-125. Wednesday, September 27: Are there really "aggressive grants" and "defensive denials?" 1. Boucher and Segal. "Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision-makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court." (57(3) JOP 824-837. Monday, October 2: Decisions on the Merits. 1. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model: Chapters 6 and 8. 2. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 66-79. Wednesday, October 4: Is that all there is? 1. George and Epstein. "On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision-making." (86(2) APSR 323-337). 2. Mishler, William and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. "The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution: The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions". (87 APSR 87-101). 3. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 157-163. 4. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model: Chapter 10. Monday, October 9: Columbus Day and Yom Kippur - No class. Wednesday, October 11: Opinion Assignment and Patterns of Influence. 1. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model: Chapter 7. 2. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 88-95 125-135. 3. Maltzman and Wahlbeck. "May it Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court." (40(2) AJPS 421-443). TopMonday, October 16: Does Precedent Matter on the Supreme Court? 1. Segal and Spaeth, "The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Voted of United States Supreme Court Justices," (40(4) AJPS 971-1003). 2. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 163-177. Wednesday, October 18: Of course it does! 1. Knight and Epstein, "The Norm of Stare Decisis," (40(4) AJPS 1018-1035). 2. Brenner and Stier, "Retesting Segal and Spaeth's Stare Decisis Model," (40(4) AJPS 1036-1048). 3. Segal and Spaeth "Norms, Dragons, and Stare Decisis: A Response," (40(4) AJPS 1064-1082). Monday, October 23: The Unique Position of the Solicitor General. 1. Segal, Jeffrey 1990. "Supreme Court Support for the Solicitor General: The Effect of Presidential Appointments". (43 West Pol Q 137-152). 2. Yates and Whitford. 1998. "Presidential Power and the United States Supreme Court". (51 Pol Res Q 539-550). Top Is it influence, experience, or accommodation? 1. McGuire, Kevin T. "Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success." (57 JOP 187). 2. Deen, et al. "Presidential Influence on the Supreme Court: Solicitor General as Amicus" (manuscript). Monday, October 30: Flyout Week. No Class. Wednesday, November 1: Flyout Week. No Class. Monday, November 6: Beyond Voting: Crafting Supreme Court Opinions. 1. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 95-107. 2. Wahlbeck, Spriggs and Maltzman. "Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court." (42(1) AJPS 294-315). Top Norms of Consensus on the Supreme Court. 1. Walker, et al. "On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court." (50(2) JOP 361-389). 2. Epstein, et al. "The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court," (manuscript) 3. Schwartz, Edward. "The Concurrence Game." (manuscript). Monday, November 13: Supreme Court Nomination and Confirmation. . 1. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model: Chapter 4. 2. Caldeira and Smith. "Campaigning for the Supreme Court: The Dynamics of Public Opinion on the Thomas Nomination." (58(3) JOP 655-681). Wednesday, November 15: Is it political ideology or legal competence that matters? 1. Segal, et al. "A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups." (36(1) AJPS 96-121). Monday, November 20: Ideological Behavior on the Circuit Courts of Appeals. 1. Cross and Tiller. "Judicial Partisanship and the Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeal," (107 Yale Law Journal 2155-2176). 2. Revesz, Richard. "Environmental Regulation, Ideology and the D.C. Circuit," (83 Virginia Law Review 1717). 3. Edwards, Harry T. "Collegiality and Decision-Making on the D.C. Circuit," 84 Va.L.Rev. 1335-1370. 4. Revesz, Richard. "Ideology, Collegiality, and the D.C. Circuit: A Reply to Chief Judge Harry T. Edwards," (85(5) Virginia Law Review 805-851). Top Do Appeals Courts respond to Supreme Court Precedent? 1. Songer, et al. "The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions." (38(3) AJPS 673-696). Monday, November 27: Do race and gender affect judicial attitudes? 1. Songer, et al. "A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts: Gender Effects in the Courts of Appeals." (56(2) JOP 425-439). 2. Crowe, Nancy. "Diversity on the Federal Bench: The Effect of Judges' Sex and Race on Judicial Decision Making" (manuscript). Wednesday, November 29: Decision-making by State Supreme Court Judges. 1. Brace and Hall. "Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent." (55(4) JOP 914-935). 2. Hall, Melinda Gann. "Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts." (54(2) JOP 427-446). Monday, December 4: Separation of Powers Games. 1. The Choices Justices Make: pp. 138-157. 2. Ferejohn, and Weingast. "A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation", (12 Int. Rev. Law and Econ. 263-279). 3. Gely and Spiller "A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases." (6 JLEO, 263-300). Wednesday, December 6: Are Courts really constrained? 1. Segal. "Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts". (91 APSR 28-44). 2. Bergera, et al. "Judicial Politics and the Econometrics of Preferences," (manuscript). Monday, December 11: An integrative model. 1. The Choices Justices Make: Chapter 6. 2. Dharmapala and Schwartz. "A General Model of Judicial Decision-making: Ideology, Information, and Judicial Consistency." (manuscript). |
|||||||||||||